For the academic crackdown, colleges and universities have a drug resistance

 One scholar has lived in Europe for many years, holiday visitors. Talk about domestic academic misconduct, he combined his academic experience crackdown, trying to come do nothing.
The scholar told me that he found that domestic colleges and universities in Europe, with academic fraud event, so for basic academic conscience, to the party's school in the hope that the school seriously, can the school tell him the results, the co-signed by distinguished scholars, on the false apology.
report to schools is invalid. He went to the education authorities of the style of study committee report, he learned from the Internet, national educational authorities in 2006 set up a style of study committee, whose role is to enhance the development of University Atmosphere punish the basic norms of academic misconduct and the implementation details, and the Academic Standards for college, academic misconduct, the proposed study advice and recommendations for the relevant units of information. However, after the report sent the letter, came to nothing, no response.
then, he only turned to the media, the complaint letters sent to the media was removed the hands. The media broke the news reporter asked the school, broke the news of personnel involved, the decision to intervene, and exposure. exposure, the school, seriously, did not receive any punishment; and is the media exposure, due to the interest of protection, the parties have not been well-known academics and punished accordingly. that he is extremely confused, so the fact that a clear academic misconduct, why is it so difficult to combat domestic mm education authorities, colleges and universities are all in public, crack down on high-profile claims of academic misconduct, academic environment clean! that foreign scholars around him that the mainland academic hopeless, there is no basic academic ethics scholars, some magazines refused to publish the domestic scholars paper.
report to schools is invalid, report to the education authorities came to nothing, broke the news to the media is not Governance of academic misconduct, which go in?
down to discuss the answer, the solution seems to only two:
First, the concern, the media exposure, Forced school seriously. This is the way a certain hope that fake.
Second, civil society organizations, academic institutions crackdown. The scholar, the idea is to create a fake platform to not only accept the exposure In addition, each year in the school papers, 100 papers were randomly selected, in accordance with international standards, inspection of which there is the chance of scientific misconduct, and publicly available; then there are for each school based on the attitude of dealing with academic misconduct, the school ranked style of study, This ranking is not whether the misconduct at School, but school governance to see the seriousness of academic misconduct. The above three combine to weave a hide away so no net academic misconduct, as the international academic community, governance of Chinese scholars see the positive efforts of academic misconduct.
undoubtedly the idea of construction of meaning, however, set aside the funding of the operation (and perhaps get some of the Foundation's long-term support), to find in the country is not willing to participate in academic Identification of the various disciplines and scholars side it is very difficult. in the domestic academic community, to help identify the kind of academic achievements to the world advanced, the leading living scholars are willing to do, as well as the formation of a failure of the results of identification is not so practice; and in identification of academic misconduct, it is among the configuration and evaluation system, they are not ready to apply for any government project, is not prepared to award any newspaper, review the plan, associated with the incident have refused to be interviewed scholars, one vice president, said the media directly, on this kind of thing, I can hide hide less.
issues around the circle, or back to square one. If domestic academia, to have a group of scholars, free from constraints of interest, adhere to academic regulations, academic misconduct when Buzhi Yu developed to such an extent now, not after the occurrence of As, but not a serious blow. However, the number of scholars, to get rid of the constraints of what benefit mechanism?
Therefore, management of academic misconduct, outside the academic community in the establishment, in fact, no way. hope in the current academic interests of the institutions under the requirements of academic self-discipline, requiring schools to take seriously academic misconduct, the higher authorities to require schools to continue treatment into the academic performance evaluation of school leaders, the result can only be of academic interest of the game, rather than adhere to academic rules. and rely on the power of the academic crackdown, it is difficult to break through the wall system, only the occasional elimination of several strains of weeds is difficult to fundamentally reverse the academic atmosphere, often thrown from the current university's ; see, for academic crackdown, colleges and universities have the Academic misconduct is out of the shadow of Academic fundamental way. Chinese universities and academia, when can we listen to the proposal, and then into action?